Best Eclipse Version For Cpp On A Mac

I am just a new Mac OS X (Intel-based) user. I've been a C++ software developer for years under the Windows and using Visual Studio. I want to know which among the two IDEs are the best for C++ development. I plan to develop applications (mostly games) on Mac and iOS.

Though my real plan right now is to make C++ game engine work in Mac OS X as well. I know the choice of IDE is a matter of preference but I want to hear the pro and cons. (But please don't fight over this).

If you want a graphic development environment and you ned to be cross platform look at 'eclipse'. X-code is tied to Apple but Eclipse runs on every platform.

So far here's what I know about the two. Xcode + Already by Apple (better compatibility, hence not a bloatware) Eclipse + Some Intellisense + Refactoring To be honest, my current choice is to stick with Xcode since I don't have to install another app (Eclipse) as I can sacrifice Intellisense and refactoring features. I am not affected by source control decisions as well because I am using Perforce (I think that itself doesn't integrate well on any of the two). Please share me your experiences and thoughts on this. CodeCalibre wrote: (But please don't fight over this).

Little chance of that happening. Eclipse + Some Intellisense + Refactoring It sounds like you should be using Xcode - for no other reason than to learn about features you seem to be unaware of. I am not affected by source control decisions as well because I am using Perforce (I think that itself doesn't integrate well on any of the two).

Please see my previous comment. However, Xcode 4 will be dropping support for both Perforce and CVS. Please share me your experiences and thoughts on this.

Radarr / Radarr. How to Create a Folder for Each Movie. Jump to bottom. Carra Bussa edited this page Sep 26, 2018 7 revisions. This is NOT exactly what you want, it's got ugly output but will literally create what you asked for: create a directory for each file. Change to a test directory. (mkdir test; cd test.). All my movies are in their own folder, and radarr can see them, but do I really have to click 'add' and monitor to all 1200 movies individually? There MUST be a way to automate this! Files 2 Folder. I used a program called Files 2 Folder to make my movie library visible for import into Radarr, extract the zip to your computer and run the.exe as administrator, then click yes to add it to your right click menu. Browse to your movie folder. Select all files and right click to bring up the menu. Create a folder for each movie · radarr machine. Sonarr has many files (episodes) in each folder. That makes perfect sense. But for movies, why do I want many folders, with just a single file in each one? It's just not efficient. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Of course the movies now show up under the TV Show tab, but it keeps them together in a folder-type place. I also did this with music videos, making them all part of a TV Series, so they all show up under one icon in the TV Show tab.

Eclipse is junk. Adam.roth wrote: I see. No specifics as to why you feel that way?

The original poster asked for 'experiences and thoughts', not specifics. I used Eclipse back in 2006, I think. I was working in Java. As an IDE it was adequate, but no more than that. It was like the first layer of options all worked well, but if you went one layer deeper, nothing worked.

The best part about it was the custom UI library for Java. That is the only decent Java UI I have ever seen. I found Eclipse a bit ugly, awkward to use, and not entirely pleasant.

Xcode is much better in all those respects. Plus, trying to build Mac applications in Eclipse is just a waste of time. For instance, I can say that XCode4 is junk because it crashes several times a day (for me and for everyone else in the office), and brings up messages asking if it should crash or 'continue in an inconsistent state' several times more.